Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 28599 à à à
Year of production 2013-2015 - -
Body type
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 6 s.- Manual s.- s.-
Fuel type Diesel
Top speed 180 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 13.0 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 5.2L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 3.9L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 4.4L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level F
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 1598 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 114 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 120 hp. / 88 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 3750
Max torque 320 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 1750
Turbo Yes, with intercooler
Fuel system Common rail
Engine type dohc
Cylinders 4, , ,
Valves per cylinder 4
Bore 79.5 mm mm mm
Stroke 80.5 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 16.5 :1
Catalyst
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant No
Basic data
Tire size 205/50R17
Turning circle 10.6m m m
Fuel tank 50 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 2150
Dimensions
Length 4300 mm mm mm
Width 1765 mm mm mm
Height 1585 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1280 kg kg kg
Load capacity 590 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 1870 kg kg kg
Max roof load 0 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 430 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 875 L L L
Wheelbase 2600 mm mm mm
Front track 1535 mm mm mm
Rear track 1505 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension semi-independent , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer No
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,58:1
2th gear ratio 2,05:1
3th gear ratio 1,23:1
4th gear ratio 0,88:1
5th gear ratio 0,70:1
6th gear ratio 0,59:1
7th gear ratio
8th gear ratio
9th gear ratio
Reverse gear ratio 3,41:1
Final drive 3


Share on Share on

Comparison between Suzuki 1.6 <-> <-> - comments