Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 51360 à à à
Year of production 2015-2015 - -
Body type
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 6 s.- s.- s.-
Fuel type
Top speed 223 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 9.5 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 7.3L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 4.5L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 5.5L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level C
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system
Engine Capacity 1997 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 144 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 163 hp. / 120 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 3750
Max torque 340 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 2000-3000
Turbo Yes, with intercooler
Fuel system
Engine type dohc
Cylinders 4, , ,
Valves per cylinder 4
Bore 85.0 mm mm mm
Stroke 88.0 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 16.0 :1
Catalyst
Electric Engine
Electric Engine synchronous motor / permanent magnet
Max power 37kW / 50 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 200 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 1
Battery type nickel-metal hydride
Battery capacity 1 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging -
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant Yes
Basic data
Tire size 245/45R18
Turning circle 12.2m m m
Fuel tank 72 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 2150
Dimensions
Length 4829 mm mm mm
Width 1853 mm mm mm
Height 1476 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1745 kg kg kg
Load capacity 580 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 2325 kg kg kg
Max roof load 80 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 560 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 1598 L L L
Wheelbase 2817 mm mm mm
Front track 1579 mm mm mm
Rear track 1552 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,54:1
2th gear ratio 1,92:1
3th gear ratio 1,28:1
4th gear ratio 0,91:1
5th gear ratio 0,67:1
6th gear ratio 0,53:1
7th gear ratio -
8th gear ratio -
9th gear ratio -
Reverse gear ratio 3,31:1
Final drive 4


Share on Share on

Comparison between Peugeot 2.0 <-> <-> - comments