Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 13813 à à à
Year of production 1987-1988 - -
Body type Stationwagon
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 5 s.- Manual s.- s.-
Fuel type Petrol
Top speed 170 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 11.8 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 0.0L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 0.0L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 9.3L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 1973 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 0 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 105 hp. / 77 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 5200
Max torque 162 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 4000
Turbo No
Fuel system Multipoint injection
Engine type ohc
Cylinders 4, , ,
Valves per cylinder 2
Bore 84.5 mm mm mm
Stroke 88.0 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 9.4 :1
Catalyst Yes
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS No
EBD No
Brake assistant No
Basic data
Tire size 185/70SR14
Turning circle 10.5m m m
Fuel tank 60 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP No
TC No
RPM at 120 km/h 3200
Dimensions
Length 4445 mm mm mm
Width 1690 mm mm mm
Height 1430 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1200 kg kg kg
Load capacity 535 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 1735 kg kg kg
Max roof load 75 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 1900 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 1900 L L L
Wheelbase 2550 mm mm mm
Front track 1455 mm mm mm
Rear track 1455 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension полу-независимо , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,29:1
2th gear ratio 1,85:1
3th gear ratio 1,21:1
4th gear ratio 0,91:1
5th gear ratio 0,74:1
6th gear ratio
7th gear ratio
8th gear ratio
9th gear ratio
Reverse gear ratio 3,43:1
Final drive 4


Share on Share on

Comparison between Nissan 2.0 <-> <-> - comments