Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 22963 à à à
Year of production 1981-1985 - -
Body type Stationwagon
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 5 s.- Manual s.- s.-
Fuel type Petrol
Top speed 183 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 10.3 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 0.0L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 0.0L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 11.1L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level -
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 2792 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 0 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 150 hp. / 110 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 5700
Max torque 216 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 4000
Turbo No
Fuel system Single-point injection
Engine type ohv
Cylinders 6, , ,
Valves per cylinder 2
Bore 93.0 mm mm mm
Stroke 68.5 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 9.2 :1
Catalyst No
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS No
EBD No
Brake assistant No
Basic data
Tire size 195/60HR39
Turning circle 10.5m m m
Fuel tank 63 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP No
TC No
RPM at 120 km/h 1500
Dimensions
Length 4800 mm mm mm
Width 1740 mm mm mm
Height 1380 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1387 kg kg kg
Load capacity 0 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 1387 kg kg kg
Max roof load 80 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 510 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 2149 L L L
Wheelbase 2770 mm mm mm
Front track 1510 mm mm mm
Rear track 1530 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension полу-независимо , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer No
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,36:1
2th gear ratio 1,81:1
3th gear ratio 1,26:1
4th gear ratio 1,00:1
5th gear ratio 0,83:1
6th gear ratio -
7th gear ratio -
8th gear ratio -
9th gear ratio -
Reverse gear ratio 3,37:1
Final drive 3


Share on Share on

Comparison between Ford 2.8 <-> <-> - comments