Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 34195 à à à
Year of production 2015-0 - -
Body type MPV
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 6 s.- Manual s.- s.-
Fuel type Diesel
Top speed 202 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 9.8 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 5.2L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 4.2L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 4.6L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level E
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 1997 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 119 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 150 hp. / 110 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 3500
Max torque 370 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 2000
Turbo Yes, with intercooler
Fuel system Common rail
Engine type dohc
Cylinders 4, , ,
Valves per cylinder 4
Bore 85.0 mm mm mm
Stroke 88.0 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 16.0 :1
Catalyst
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant No
Basic data
Tire size 215/50R17
Turning circle 11.2m m m
Fuel tank 60 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 2700
Dimensions
Length 4519 mm mm mm
Width 1828 mm mm mm
Height 1642 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1477 kg kg kg
Load capacity 823 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 2300 kg kg kg
Max roof load 75 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 475 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 1742 L L L
Wheelbase 2788 mm mm mm
Front track 1557 mm mm mm
Rear track 1569 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension multi-link , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,58:1
2th gear ratio 1,86:1
3th gear ratio 1,16:1
4th gear ratio 0,82:1
5th gear ratio 0,89:1
6th gear ratio 0,74:1
7th gear ratio
8th gear ratio
9th gear ratio
Reverse gear ratio 1,42:1
Final drive 3


Share on Share on

Comparison between Ford 2.0 <-> <-> - comments