Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 23995 à à à
Year of production 2015-0 - -
Body type Hatchback
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 5 s.- s.- s.-
Fuel type Petrol
Top speed 192 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 12.0 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 7.4L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 4.4L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 5.5L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level C
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 998 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 125 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 100 hp. / 74 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 6000
Max torque 170 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 1400
Turbo Yes, with intercooler
Fuel system Direct injection
Engine type dohc
Cylinders 3, , ,
Valves per cylinder 4
Bore 71.9 mm mm mm
Stroke 82.0 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 10.0 :1
Catalyst Yes
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant No
Basic data
Tire size 205/55R16
Turning circle 11.0m m m
Fuel tank 55 L L L
Locking differential Yes
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 0
Dimensions
Length 4360 mm mm mm
Width 1823 mm mm mm
Height 1484 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1176 kg kg kg
Load capacity 724 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 1900 kg kg kg
Max roof load 75 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 363 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 1148 L L L
Wheelbase 2648 mm mm mm
Front track 1544 mm mm mm
Rear track 1534 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension multi-link , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,58:1
2th gear ratio 1,93:1
3th gear ratio 1,28:1
4th gear ratio 0,95:1
5th gear ratio 0,76:1
6th gear ratio
7th gear ratio
8th gear ratio
9th gear ratio
Reverse gear ratio 3,62:1
Final drive 4


Share on Share on

Comparison between Ford 1.0 <-> <-> - comments