Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 185370 à à à
Year of production 2015-0 - -
Body type
Seats 7
Transmission / Gearbox 8 s.- s.- s.-
Fuel type Petrol
Top speed 180 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 6.9 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 18.0L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 10.3L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 13.1L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level G
Wheel drive
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 6162 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 302 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 426 hp. / 313 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 5600
Max torque 610 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 4100
Turbo No
Fuel system Direct injection
Engine type ohv
Cylinders 8, , ,
Valves per cylinder 2
Bore 103.3 mm mm mm
Stroke 92.0 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 11.5 :1
Catalyst Yes
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant Yes
Basic data
Tire size 285/45R22
Turning circle 13.1m m m
Fuel tank 98 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 1650
Dimensions
Length 5697 mm mm mm
Width 2061 mm mm mm
Height 1896 mm mm mm
Curb weight 2767 kg kg kg
Load capacity 635 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 3402 kg kg kg
Max roof load 0 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 431 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 3424 L L L
Wheelbase 3302 mm mm mm
Front track 1746 mm mm mm
Rear track 1744 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , air / pneumatic , ,
Rear suspension rigid , air / pneumatic , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 4,56:1
2th gear ratio 2,97:1
3th gear ratio 2,08:1
4th gear ratio 1,69:1
5th gear ratio 1,27:1
6th gear ratio 1,00:1
7th gear ratio 0,85:1
8th gear ratio 0,65:1
9th gear ratio -
Reverse gear ratio 3,82:1
Final drive 3


Share on Share on

Comparison between Cadillac 6.2 <-> <-> - comments