Compare cars - specs, consumption, review, dimensions - car comparison

Car 1

Clear

Car 2

Car 3

General Information
Last new price 29800 à à à
Year of production 2016-0 - -
Body type Hatchback
Seats 5
Transmission / Gearbox 6 s.- Manual s.- s.-
Fuel type Petrol
Top speed 195 km/h km/h km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h 8.9 sec sec sec
Fuel consumption - Urban 6.5L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Extra-urban 4.3L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Fuel cons. - Combined 5.1L/100 km L/100 km L/100 km
Energy level B
Wheel drive Front
Fuel engine
Drive system Fuel engine
Engine Capacity 1998 cm.3 cm.3 cm.3
CO2 Emission 119 gr./km. gr./km. gr./km.
Max power 120 hp. / 88 kW hp. / kW hp. / kW
     -at RPM 6000
Max torque 210 Nm Nm Nm
     -at RPM 4000
Turbo No
Fuel system Direct injection
Engine type dohc
Cylinders 4, Inline , ,
Valves per cylinder 4
Bore 83.5 mm mm mm
Stroke 91.2 mm mm mm
Compression ratio 14.0 :1
Catalyst Yes
Electric Engine
Electric Engine
Max power 0kW / 0 hp. kW / hp. kW / hp.
Max torque 0 Nm Nm Nm
Number of engines 0
Battery type
Battery capacity 0 kWh kWh kWh
Battery voltage 0 V V V
Charging
Brake system
Front Brakes ventilated disc
Rear Brakes disc
ABS Yes
EBD Yes
Brake assistant Yes
Basic data
Tire size 215/45R18
Turning circle 10.6m m m
Fuel tank 51 L L L
Locking differential No
ESP Yes
TC Yes
RPM at 120 km/h 2400
Dimensions
Length 4460 mm mm mm
Width 1795 mm mm mm
Height 1450 mm mm mm
Curb weight 1180 kg kg kg
Load capacity 635 kg 0 kg 0 kg
Curb weight + max load 1815 kg kg kg
Max roof load 75 kg kg kg
Min Trunk capacity 364 L L L
Max Trunk capacity 1263 L L L
Wheelbase 2700 mm mm mm
Front track 1555 mm mm mm
Rear track 1560 mm mm mm
Suspension
Front suspension independent, McPherson , coil springs , ,
Rear suspension multi-link , coil springs , ,
Front stabilizer Yes
Rear stabilizer Yes
Gear ratio
1th gear ratio 3,70:1
2th gear ratio 1,95:1
3th gear ratio 1,30:1
4th gear ratio 1,03:1
5th gear ratio 0,84:1
6th gear ratio 0,68:1
7th gear ratio -
8th gear ratio -
9th gear ratio -
Reverse gear ratio 3,72:1
Final drive 3


Share on Share on

Comparison between Mazda SkyActiv-G 2.0 120 GT-M <-> <-> - comments

Do Not Enter!